23 Percent Don’t Know What They Are Doing

23 Percent Don’t Know What They Are Doing

It’s another election week in the United States of America.

Monday November 4th is when this article gets published on my website and the audio version is released as episode 353 of the Genuine ScLoHo Media and Marketing podcast.

Because I work in the media, specially for a highly popular news talk radio station WOWO in Fort Wayne, Indiana, I’m very aware of the political world.  Because I also listen and watch other media that presents news and views from a different political perspective, I’m pretty well rounded.

Because I’ve worked in media for a long time, starting as a teenager, but let’s say 30+ years, I’m also aware of the ways and whys media act the way the do.  Not just news but entertainment too.

I’ve now spent 21 years in Fort Wayne media on the sales and advertising business side and every four years some businesses get a little too caught up in political speculation.

Last month a study was released by Borrell Associates pertaining to this.  Here’s a quote from InsideAudioMarketing.com:

A lot is riding on the outcome of what happens on Election Day, and one of the potential impacts will be the advertising market. A survey of local advertisers by Borrell Associates finds that nearly one in four (23%) of small and medium-sized businesses say their advertising and marketing spending will be impacted depending on whether Kamala Harris or Donald Trump wins in November. Another 30% say they aren’t sure, while 47% say they don’t expect ad spending to shift much regardless of the election outcome.

Some of my co-workers have seen this apprehension from their advertising partners about how the outcome of the election will determine the success of their business.

Let’s dig deeper into this article:

Borrell data shows supporters of former President Trump are more likely to alter their spending plans based on the winner. Among Trump supporters, nearly a third (31%) of local businesses say their advertising plans will be modified if their candidate returns to office…However, local business owners who support Vice President Harris are less likely to be influenced. Borrell says only 14% of those in the Harris camp say they will change their marketing plans based on whether she is the winner.

While the impact of the policies that each side will have different potential ramifications for business owners, placing that much emphasis on who the President is to determine your ad spend is stupid and ignorant for small and medium sized businesses.

If your business produces a good product or service and uses advertising and marketing correctly, none of this political stuff matters that much.

What do I mean by correctly?  Advertising is simple.  It’s just inviting potential customers to spend their money with you.

If you slow down or stop inviting people to your business and coast for awhile, your business will decline.  Because you can only coast downhill.

When I titled this 23 Percent Don’t Know What They Are Doing, that refers to the one out of four or five businesses that are placing too much emphasis on political outcomes this week and instead should focus on what they can do to improve their company and invite more people to become their customers.

I’ve lived through the financial hiccups of 2008 and saw smart business people surviving while those that were scared shut down.

Or maybe they weren’t smart, they were just stubbornly determined to keep doing the right thing and they pushed forward while others dropped out and as the saying goes, the strong survive.

One more bit of info from that article:

The top three issues facing small businesses, according to Borrell’s survey, are the cost of labor, mentioned by 40% of those surveyed, followed by the cost of technology (39%), hiring and attracting new employees (31%), taxes (28%), and keeping up with technology (18%).

Valid points.

Still you need customers so please continue to invite us.

 

 

Is Your Brand Identity Correct?

Is Your Brand Identity Correct?

My favorite carbonated beverage is changing their branding.

So I’m going to stop drinking it in protest.

Just kidding.

Mountain Dew is changing their labeling to Mountain Dew.

I know, that sounds weird but it’s a visual change, not a verbal change.

Here’s the story from Mediapost titled:

Mountain Dew Unveils New Logo, Visual Identity

After around 15 years, Mountain Dew has found its vowels again.

The brand unveiled its new logo — eschewing the “Mtn Dew” stylization officially introduced in the U.S. market in 2009 –– in favor of the full brand name, while tying the brand’s visual identity back to mountainous peaks portrayed in the background as it approaches its 75th anniversary. Mountain Dew’s new logo also includes small text reading “Est. 1948” over the “W” in its brand name, a nod to the year the trademark was officially established.

I know, it’s shocking.  I say that with a ting of sarcasm.

Because honestly, I don’t recall them dropping the vowels out of Mountain in 2009.  I didn’t change my buying habits and I won’t now, or when the new logo comes out in 2025.

I was trying to recall when I started drinking the Dew, and I’m guessing it was in the 90’s as an alternative to coffee.  Nothing wrong with coffee but the Dew also replaced Pepsi as my go to cold beverage.  I recall having a conversation with my kids when they questioned my drinking Mountain Dew in the morning and I pointed out to them that the second ingredient on the label was concentrated orange juice. Let’s be honest, besides the taste and the O.J.  Mountain Dew had more caffeine than Pepsi or Coke and that was the main reason I drank it.  Also a little over 20 years ago I switched to the diet versions of soft drinks.

What I just shared was my own story and reasons for drinking Mountain Dew.

It has nothing to do with the name, or the logo. Yet someone in their advertising agency was paid big bucks to revamp their visual image.

I’m not against updates.  One of my favorite advertising partners on WOWO radio has done an internal name change this year and we’ve updated his ads and also the visual elements.  There was nothing wrong with the previous name, Moore and Associates, but it really didn’t identify his brand.  Unless you knew from the advertisements that have aired on WOWO for over 29 years who Chris Moore is and what he does, Moore and Associates could be a law firm, or a plumber or nearly anything.

His new name is much more clear and a much stronger branding statement.  Moore Wealth Management.  Chris and his team have grown over the past 3 decades and the new name is accurate as it reflects what they do now and what they’ve been doing for years.

With all do respect to my friends who specialize in graphic design and understand the subconscious influences of color and typography including font selection, those are secondary to having a good product and service that people will talk about positively.  As a side note, I like Comic Sans.  Time to crack open a Diet Mtn Dew.

 

Audio Advertising: Streaming Music versus Traditional Radio

Audio Advertising: Streaming Music versus Traditional Radio

I’ve been getting a lot of research and data coming my direction that I’ve decided to share with you in a series of articles I’m labeling Audio Advertising.  As a business owner or just a regular consumer, we hear and read various things that we might think are more true than they really are.

One of the ways to identify these types of mis-information is when they include absolute statements such as:

No one listens to music on the radio anymore.

Sports Fans watch all their games on TV or in person.

Podcasts are what everyone is listening to these days.

Or Radio is dead.

The past couple of weeks, I’ve addressed the Radio is Dead rumor with evidence that it’s not.  It’s alive and thriving.  If you missed those stories, go back and read or listen to the podcast episodes.

Before I joined News/Talk WOWO radio in 2013, I worked primarily for music stations.  The past couple of decades pundits were eager to declare that ad supported free AM/FM commercial radio was dying and people were now going to listen to their favorite songs via streaming services.  Pandora Music was one of thee first that has it’s roots going back to the year 2000.  It was September of 2005 that they officially launched as a subscription ad-free music service but then they added a free service that included advertising, similar to traditional radio.

According to Wikipedia, Pandora grew to around 70 million active monthly users worldwide, but that number comes from 2013.

What does this have to do with advertising?

A couple of things… 

Local businesses can pay to run ads on Pandora.  

Pandora is not the only music streaming service and others also offer ad placement, Spotify is the most recognized for home/office and Sirius XM for mobile listening in vehicles.

Pandora and these other streaming radio services never have had the number of listeners that traditional radio stations continue to have and a recent study shows that Pandora’s ability to reach local listeners with your advertising message has been declining for years.

Here are some highlights from a report from Westwood One titled What Ever Happened to Pandora:

Here are five key findings:

  1. Since consumer interest in Pandora Radio hit an all-time high in 2008, its audience and profile have significantly collapsed, according to Google Search trends.
  2. A brand-new Advertiser Perceptions study conducted in August 2024 reveals marketers and media agencies need to “take the me out of media” as they wildly overestimate Spotify and Pandora audiences and dramatically understate AM/FM radio’s shares.
  3. AM/FM radio represents the dominant ad-supported audio platform with a 69% overall share and a massive 86% in-car share.
  4. Podcast audiences soar. At a 19% share of ad-supported audio, podcasts now represent one out of every five minutes of U.S. ad-supported audio.
  5. Among registered voters, AM/FM radio leads in ad-supported audience share (69%), followed by podcasts (19%).

I’ll have more on the podcast growth trend in a few weeks.  For now, let’s dig into the Pandora data:

Ad-supported Pandora’s daily reach has been cut in half; AM/FM radio streaming is twice as big as ad-supported Pandora and ad-supported Spotify

Since 2017, Edison’s “Share of Ear” reports ad-supported Pandora’s daily reach has plunged from 12% to 6%. At a 63% daily reach, AM/FM radio’s audience is ten times larger than Pandora. Amazingly, the 11% daily reach of AM/FM radio streaming is double that of ad-supported Pandora (6%) and ad-supported Spotify (5%).

Looking at one of the charts, we see that AM/FM radio listenership either over the air or via a stream was 77% of daily listening in 2017 and in 2024 it’s 70%.  Meanwhile Pandora dropped from 12% down to 6%, Spotify went up 1% from 4 to 5 while Sirius remains flat at 5% of daily listening.

Most traditional AM/FM radio stations offer additional ways to listen to your favorite station along with a regular AM/FM radio and that’s where the streaming comes in.  In my home we have both Alexa and Google Home smart speakers which have replaced the radios in a couple of rooms in our house.  

As an experiment for this article, i listened to Pandora for about an hour and never heard any local ads.  When I looked at the display ads, again nothing local and nothing targeted to me despite the fact they have that meta data. The job I had before returning to radio in 2013 involved a lot of desk work and I would listen to Pandora for a portion of the work day.

Bottom line is in order to invite local consumers to your business, local radio is still an excellent choice you need to consider.

 

What’s the Value of Your Name?

What’s the Value of Your Name?

Just a quick word of caution today about your company name… it’s more valuable than you think.

A story about the Campbell Soup Company wanting to change their name after 155 years hit my inbox this week and I hope that they handle this carefully.

Mediapost.com’s headline: Campbell’s Soup Aims To Drop ‘Soup’

and the story:

After 155 years, an iconic and historic brand is considering a name change that will help communicate the diversity of its product offerings. 

“At an investor event Tuesday, Chief Executive Mark Clouse revealed that the storied company would ask shareholders to approve a name change, from Campbell Soup Company to The Campbell’s Company. It is a significant shift that underscores how much transformation has occurred since Clouse took over in January 2019,” according to The Wall Street Journal. 

Nearly half the company’s sales come from snacks, including such brands as Goldfish crackers and Kettle chips.

“Clouse told Wall Street at its investor day that Campbell’s is focusing on 16 top brands across its meals and beverages and snacking division including Goldfish, V8 beverages and Prego sauces,” according to Reuters

A Campbell’s representative tells Today.com that, if approved, its current web address — which still contains the word “soup” — will also change, but that doesn’t mean it’s forgetting the source of Andy Warhol’s inspiration. The representative also confirms that, despite the proposed name change, the company will still be known as “Campbell’s.”

“Last year, Campbell’s snack sales grew 13%, while its soups grew 3%,” reports CNN Business. “Legacy food companies like Campbell are pivoting to gain a larger share of the snack market, valued at more than $200 billion by market research firm Circana. Nearly half of Americans say they eat at least three snacks a day, according to Circana.”

Campbell recently acquired Sovos Brands, which includes Rao’s sauces, Michael Angelo’s frozen entrees and Noosa’s Yoghurt.

“The $2.7 billion deal will bolster Campbell’s food and beverage line in which soup remains important but is a smaller portion of the portfolio,” according to USA Today

If this name change is only at a corporate level and not a rebranding marketing plan too, then this isn’t all that important to their sales and future branding.  Some companies have done this successfully such as Google became Alphabet and Facebook became Meta.  What’s important is both Google and Facebook continued with their original brand names despite having a new corporate identity.  Other companies such as Twitter threw away their identity with the renaming to X.  Of course Elon Musk’s involvement changed the whole identity of Twitter and X is very different from the Twitter platform I first joined in 2008.

Some brands name change evolved more organically, as Chevrolet earned the Chevy nickname decades ago.  Kentucky Fried Chicken became KFC when Americans were told that we should not eat fried foods, but some people already referred to them as KFC before they officially rebranded to just the three KFC letters.

The smart thing for the new Campbells company to do is to retain the legendary brand names that they now own and continue to promote those.  That’s what Proctor and Gamble has done.  The dumb thing would be to rebrand those iconic brands like Goldfish, V8 and Prego, dropping those names and replacing them with the Campbell name.  Those names have value and despite a corporate name change Campbell means soup to the consumer.

If you’re considering a name change for your business or starting a business and need to pick a name, contact me first.  I’ve seen multiple successes and a few failures in this area and can help guide you.

Lessons to Learn from Proctor & Gamble

Lessons to Learn from Proctor & Gamble

Today’s article  is going to break my usual self-imposed 10 minute rule. Nearly every article on my website and podcast episodes are under 10 minutes in length.  This one is longer because I want you to get all the information and understand why it’s valid.  We’ll start with the last part first.

In September 2023, I attended the Radio Sales Master Summit in Cincinnati, Ohio and got to attend multiple seminars and panel discussions and hang out with some of the guest speakers that weekend about a year ago.

One of the speakers was former Senior Media Analyst for Procter & Gamble John Fix who shared how he discovered the mistake that Proctor & Gamble made that was costing them tons of money and market share and then he fixed the problem.

John retired from P & G and created his own consultancy and has shared some of his tips and wisdom including something this summer that I’ll share in a moment.

John’s background is not advertising.  He’s an engineer and his role at Proctor and Gamble was an analyst.  He looked at numbers and data and using the science of engineering created hypothesizes and experiments to test how the validity of what he was doing.

From this article from RBR.com:

P&G noticed the trend of shrinking TV audiences in 2017. They started pumping more money into radio at the urging of media analyst John Fix. TV CPMs remain expensive due to demand – add an audience in decline and that higher cost is also considerably less effective.

Consumers have more choices on what to watch and how to watch it than ever before.  The mass media of network TV from decades ago has been shrinking to the point of actually having too many choices for companies like P&G.  There’s a term called CPM which refers to Cost Per Thousand that simply refers to the cost to reach a thousand people in reference to the cost of an ad.

Here’s some more facts and figures, originally published in March 2023:

Details of the P&G 2022 radio ad spend come as it was revealed that 18- to 49-year-olds are spending more time listening to the radio than watching linear TV for the first time ever.

It’s a cost-effective method for the company as the CPM to reach that same audience on TV is as high as $35-$65. YouTube CPMs range from $20-$25 and linear TV is in the $10-$15 range. Radio can be bought at a cost-per-thousand of $5-$6.

Those CPM figures are based on volume buying which for Proctor and Gamble is substantial. According to my sources, their total ad spend in 2022 was $2.2 Billion and radio recieved $235 million of that spend.

This increased investment in radio has only increased since 2022.  As reported in April 2024:

The consumer-packaged goods giant boosted its ad spend as a share of sales by … more than $360 million, Chief Financial Officer Andre Schulten said in a media briefing. The Cincinnati-based manufacturer is famous in marketing circles for conducting rigorous and sophisticated research and analytics to ensure its marketing dollars deliver maximum return on investment. Said Schulten, “We will not spend if there’s no ROI.”

So what can we learn and apply to our local businesses when it comes to making smart advertising and marketing decisions?  Here’s the latest from John Fix:

A long-held perception is that sight is needed to create product identity. The following is a framework that was used to talk about the role of media in different situations. It ties into how audio can work with a well-thought-out product.

Audio, specifically AM/FM radio, creates reach and brand awareness. This is important for new products as building awareness is key. A product cannot sell if consumers are not aware of it.

Brands are afraid that audio may not create awareness for new products because there is a belief that it is hard to talk about a product that consumers have not seen. The fear is that awareness may not translate to identifying the product at the point of sale (on the shelf) to make a purchase.

Incorporating audio in a media plan, especially a new product with a budget that does not include traditional mass reach media like linear TV, can be game changing. The next points elaborate on how awareness can work.

New product introduction and the role of audio

  • BRANDING: Say the brand early, often, and spell out the name. Audio best practices highly recommend strong branding and using the name of the band. The brand name would ideally be spelled as it sounds so that saying the brand easily translates to recognition of the brand as it would appear on the label. If the brand name uses non-traditional language or an acronym, spelling the brand would not be a bad idea. Think of all of the new brands with names like “Sploosh” or with names of foreign origin. Lyft, Tumblr, Krispy Kreme, etc. are brand names that may require an audio prompt like “Krispy Kreme, spelled with a ‘K.’” The phrase “spell it out” may be taken literally.
  •  
  • BENEFIT: Lead with a recognizable benefit for the consumer. Products exist to serve a purpose. Advertising can be weak when the benefit is an indescribable aesthetic, which is why beauty brands used to stay away from audio. Advertisers believed that beauty relies on sight and motion. Beauty advertisers learned the way to describe the benefit of “silky hair,” “brilliant, white teeth,” and identifiable terms for curly hair. Laundry learned to use adjectives to describe “clean laundry.” Even scented products learned their way into describing scents (nature fresh) with audio. Brands should utilize their consumer research to find the clearest, simple description of the product benefit and use it in the audio. If a brand can articulate a benefit, then audio will work. If there isn’t a strong recognizable benefit to the consumer, then a brand will have to think very hard about the product and the right of the product to succeed. Natural products tend to be safe and environmentally friendly. If that is the point of differentiation in a category, it should be said. “Natural” all but speaks for itself. Elaborate with audio.
  •  
  • PACKAGING: Tell the consumer what to look for on the shelf. Products ideally have a form similar to the category. Mouthwash is typically a clear bottle with a large cap. Laundry and dishwashing detergent used to be a box with powder. Then they became a bottle with liquid and now, a novel container with pods. If the new product is in a form unlike the category or if the product uses assets unlike those familiar to the brand, then the audio should describe what the consumer should look for: “found in the bright yellow bottle,” “the toothpaste not in a tube,” “dishwasher detergent in a pod.” This allows audio to tell the consumer what to look for on the shelf. This would help a consumer to identify the brand and find the product at the point of sale.
  •  
  • DISTRIBUTION/SHELF: Be descriptive on where to find the product in its category. If a product delivers a tangible benefit, then finding the product shouldn’t be hard. Market structure determines that retailers place substitutable products near each other: cleaning products, auto, household goods. New products should be in outlets where the category is sold. A brand, especially a new innovation, should say which product category it is associated with if necessary: “Found where cleaning products are sold.” This is also where the description of the package can help: “Available at grocery stores in the orange bottle.”

Audio can help your brand become “easy to mind, easy to find”

This framework was very helpful to the advertiser of innovative products. The framework tied the brand name, the appearance, and the strengths of the product to the applicability of audio.

More can be said specific to the belief that “sight is necessary to convey a benefit.” Cosmetics and beauty have long held the idea that the aesthetic benefit requires a consumer to see the end result. A good media brief for an image or video ad would describe exactly what would be desired in a visual medium and that language should be compelling in audio.

Audio best practices stress the importance of branding and conveying the benefit of the product. This framework adds the importance of making the brand physically identifiable and shows that it is possible for audio to lead a consumer to the shelf to find the product that will deliver the job to be done.

John Fix can be reached at johnfixltd@gmail.com.

How do you apply this advice to your local company?  Contact me: Scott@ScLoHo.net

Generational Changes and Media Use

Generational Changes and Media Use

Frequently I’ve pushed back against generational stereotypes with the simple premise that activities and behaviors that are being assigned and labeled according to what generation a person is, are really due to lifestyle and life-stage.

And while many of that is still true, there are some big swings in media consumption that still can be broken down by generation due to the technology changes the past couple of decades.

Even the past 10+ years that I’ve worked for WOWO radio have seen a shift that should not be ignored.

MarketingCharts.com released an article on social media use that actually has a misleading headline: Most US Weekly Facebook Users are Gen Xers and Baby Boomers.

However looking at the actual chart and data from YouGov, the headline should have been Most US Weekly Facebook Users are Millennials, Gen Xers and Baby Boomers.

Those three generations make up 84% of Facebook users in the United States.  The Silent Generation, which are those still alive born before the end of World War 2 make up 1% and the youngest Generation, Gen Z account for 13% of Facebook users.

Overall, Facebook still is king with more users than any of the other social media platforms but it appears YouTube is close although many of us “older folks” don’t consider YouTube to be social media.  But with the popularity of video content verus still photos or no graphics, YouTube should be included even though they were not listed in the survey and article

So I decided to do a double check on the current ages of Gen Z and as of right now, 12 to 27 year olds are Zers.

The youngest most marketers usually target is around 12, so Gen Z is a real, viable target market for companies that produce products and services for teens and young adults.

To put that in perspective, 10, 11 years ago when I joined WOWO radio, some of them were still in diapers and none were old enough to vote yet.

IF that’s the age group you want to reach, you should dig a little deeper into social media and the various platforms and targeting potential.

However, here’s a reality that is back to the lifestyle and life-stage argument….

Most significant purchases are not made during the teen years or even by 20 year olds.  Look at age 35+, or even older like 45 or age 50+.

Gen Z is inching to that age but for the next decade, unless your consumer is in their 20’s and younger, you need to really continue to focus on older adults.

I call them “grown-ups” . They’re in their late 30’s, 40’s and 50’s making significant purchases for themselves and for their families.

My primary radio station, WOWO is a news talk formated radio station and we’ve seen wonderful results for our advertising partners.  I’m not arrogant enough to say that traditional radio ads are all you need to do.  I usually offer a number of items off the menu of messaging options that include traditional AM/FM radio ads, streaming, emails, texting, and social media including Facebook.

Do you want help sorting all this out to help you decide where to invest your ad dollars?  Want to talk with someone who’s got the experience in crafting solutions that are appropriate for your business and that sometimes includes connecting you with others that I trust?  Let’s talk.  Email Scott@ScLoHo.net